• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Bolek Besser Glesius LLC

Bolek Besser Glesius LLC

Devoted to Justice

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment Law
      • Wrongful Termination
      • Workplace Retaliation & Whistleblower Cases
      • Sexual Harassment
      • Age Discrimination
      • Disability Discrimination
      • Pregnancy Discrimination
      • Race Discrimination
      • Family Medical Leave Act
      • Overtime Pay and Minimum Wage
      • Employment Contracts & Severance Packages
      • Restrictive Covenants & Non-Compete Agreements
      • Executive Compensation
      • View All
    • First Amendment Lawyers
      • Ohio Free Speech Attorneys
        • Government Employee Free Speech
        • Student Free Speech Rights in Ohio
        • Significant Ohio Free Speech Cases
      • Religious Freedom
    • Appellate Practice
    • Small Business Litigation
  • About Us
    • Cathleen M. Bolek
    • Matthew D. Besser
    • Amy S. Glesius
  • Results
  • FAQ
  • Articles
  • BBG Newsroom
  • Contact
  • Blog
(216) 464-3004
Contact Us Now
GET HELP NOW
CALL US NOW

Supreme Court to Take up A&F Employment Discrimination Case

October 6, 2014 By Matthew Besser Leave a Comment

Can employees bring a religious discrimination lawsuit due to an employer’s failure to accommodate religious practices if the need for the accommodation is obvious, but the employee did not explicitly request one? That is the issue the U.S. Supreme Court announced last week it would soon consider in a case involving a Muslim woman denied employment by Abercrombie & Fitch because she wore a religious headscarf. The case, EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., has the potential to be one of the most important of the year for employment lawyers who handle religious discrimination cases.

A&F
Photo Credit: jpellgen via Compfight cc

Federal employment discrimination law makes it illegal to discriminate against employees or applicants in hiring, firing, and other terms and conditions of employment on the basis of religion. The law requires employers to accommodate an employee’s or applicant’s “religious observance and practice” unless the employer shows it cannot reasonably make the accommodation without “undue hardship” on the business.

Clothing retailer Abercrombie & Fitch has a dress code for its sales employees, which it calls its “Look Policy.” The Policy is intended to convey a “classic East Coast collegiate style of clothing.” Among other things, the Policy prohibits employees from wearing “caps.” A&F management has interpreted the Policy to ban religious headscarves. Over the past few years, several lawsuits have been brought against A&F, alleging that its dress code discriminates against Muslim women by prohibiting them from wearing a religious headscarf, known as a hijab. We have previously written about one of those employment discrimination lawsuits, here.

At issue in the case recently accepted by the Supreme Court is whether an employee or applicant must make an explicit, verbal request for a religious accommodation, or whether it is enough that the employer knew from the facts and circumstances that one was needed. Put differently, is an employer required to make an accommodation if it knows one is necessary (and can be reasonably made without undue burden), or must the employee first use certain “magic words” to request an accommodation. Several Courts of Appeal have held that no magic words are necessary if the employer has enough information to know an accommodation is necessary. In the A&F case, however, the Court of Appeals held the opposite. The Supreme Court will now resolve the conflict.

Regardless of how the A&F case turns out, employees and employers should know that reasonable changes to workplace policies and rules may be required to accommodate the religious practices of employees. If you feel you may be a victim of religious discrimination in the workplace, contact an experienced Cleveland employment lawyer right away.

Filed Under: Religious Discrimination Tagged With: discrimination attorney, religious discrimination

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

U.S. News Best Law Firms 2019 BadgeBest Lawyers Amy Glesius Lawyer of the Year BadgeMartindale AV Rated BadgeSuper Lawyers Top 100 Badge BBB Accredited Business BadgeMillion Dollar Advocates Badge

Contact Us Now

  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

U.S. News Best Law Firms 2019 BadgeBest Lawyers Amy Glesius Lawyer of the Year BadgeSuper Lawyers Top 100 BadgeMartindale AV Rated BadgeBBB Accredited Business Badge

Contact Us Now

  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Footer

Social

Follow along on social media.

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Our Cleveland Office

Monarch Centre

5885 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 302

Cleveland, OH 44124

Contact Now

Phone: 216-464-3004

Disclaimer | Privacy Policy

Contact Our Firm

Monarch Centre

5885 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 302

Cleveland, OH 44124

Contact Now

Phone: 216-464-3004

Disclaimer

Copyright © 2023 · Business Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Employment Law
      ▼
      • Wrongful Termination
      • Workplace Retaliation & Whistleblower Cases
      • Sexual Harassment
      • Age Discrimination
      • Disability Discrimination
      • Pregnancy Discrimination
      • Race Discrimination
      • Family Medical Leave Act
      • Overtime Pay and Minimum Wage
      • Employment Contracts & Severance Packages
      • Restrictive Covenants & Non-Compete Agreements
      • Executive Compensation
      • View All
    • First Amendment Lawyers
      ▼
      • Ohio Free Speech Attorneys
        ▼
        • Government Employee Free Speech
        • Student Free Speech Rights in Ohio
        • Significant Ohio Free Speech Cases
      • Religious Freedom
    • Appellate Practice
    • Small Business Litigation
  • About Us
    ▼
    • Cathleen M. Bolek
    • Matthew D. Besser
    • Amy S. Glesius
  • Results
  • FAQ
  • Articles
  • BBG Newsroom
  • Contact
  • Blog