• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Bolek Besser Glesius LLC

Bolek Besser Glesius LLC

Devoted to Justice

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment Law
      • Wrongful Termination
      • Workplace Retaliation & Whistleblower Cases
      • Sexual Harassment
      • Age Discrimination Attorney
      • Disability Discrimination
      • Pregnancy Discrimination
      • Race Discrimination
      • Family Medical Leave Act
      • Overtime Pay and Minimum Wage
      • Employment Contracts & Severance Packages
      • Restrictive Covenants & Non-Compete Agreements
      • Executive Compensation
      • View All
    • First Amendment Lawyers
      • Ohio Free Speech Attorneys
        • Government Employee Free Speech
        • Student Free Speech Rights in Ohio
        • Significant Ohio Free Speech Cases
      • Religious Freedom
    • Appellate Practice
    • Small Business Litigation
  • About Us
    • Cathleen M. Bolek
    • Matthew D. Besser
    • Amy S. Glesius
    • Kelly S. Rochotte
  • Results
  • FAQ
  • Articles
  • BBG Newsroom
  • Contact
  • Blog
(216) 464-3004
Contact Us Now
GET HELP NOW
CALL US NOW

Race Discrimination in Healthcare Based on Patient Preference

March 3, 2013 By Matthew Besser Leave a Comment

A recent case from a Michigan hospital provides a poignant reminder that companies cannot use the racism of customers to discriminate against employees on the basis of race. In Cleveland, where we have a vibrant healthcare industry, the case should be a lesson to hospital systems, nursing homes, and to healthcare workers themselves that employees are to be judged on their merits and abilities, not their skin color.

Flashing a swastika tattoo, a man at a Flint, Michigan hospital recently demanded that African American nurses not be allowed to care for his newborn baby. The hospital obliged the man’s request, noting in the baby’s chart, “No African American nurse to take care of baby.” An African-American nurse who was removed from caring for the newborn filed suit against the hospital. Apparently having realized its mistake, the hospital promptly settled.

It is illegal for a company to discriminate against its employees on the basis of its customers’ racial preferences. These “customer preference” discrimination cases can arise particularly in the healthcare field, where patients at a hospital or nursing home may harbor racist beliefs. The Michigan hospital violated the law when it removed the African American nurse from her regular job duties in order to satisfy the preferences of a patient’s racist father. The same would be true had the incident occurred in one of Cleveland’s many healthcare facilities.

Because of differences in statutory language, under very limited circumstances, employers might be able to use customer (or patient) preference as a defense to a sex discrimination claim. For instance, a defense might be based on privacy concerns of having an opposite sex healthcare worker caring for the patient. But that defense does not apply to race discrimination. One court explained the distinction with an analogy: “[T]he law tolerates same-sex restrooms or same-sex dressing rooms, but not white-only rooms, to accommodate privacy needs.” Chaney v. Plainfield Healthcare Ctr., 612 F.3d 908, 913 (7th Cir. 2010).

The Michigan case is an example of how not to act. Nurses and other healthcare workers employed in Cleveland’s many hospital systems and nursing homes should be aware that patient racial preferences are no justification for discrimination.

Filed Under: Race discrimination

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Best Law Firms - Regional Tier 1 BadgeBest Lawyers Amy Glesius Lawyer of the Year BadgeMartindale AV Rated BadgeSuper Lawyers Top 100 Badge BBB Accredited Business BadgeMillion Dollar Advocates Badge

Contact Us Now

  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

U.S. News Best Law Firms 2019 BadgeBest Lawyers Amy Glesius Lawyer of the Year BadgeSuper Lawyers Top 100 BadgeMartindale AV Rated BadgeBest Law Firms - Regional Tier 1 Badge

Contact Us Now

  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Footer

Social

Follow along on social media.

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Our Cleveland Office

Monarch Centre

5885 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 302

Cleveland, OH 44124

Contact Now

Phone: 216-464-3004

Disclaimer | Privacy Policy

Contact Our Firm

Monarch Centre

5885 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 302

Cleveland, OH 44124

Contact Now

Phone: 216-464-3004

Disclaimer

Copyright © 2025 · Business Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Employment Law
      ▼
      • Wrongful Termination
      • Workplace Retaliation & Whistleblower Cases
      • Sexual Harassment
      • Age Discrimination Attorney
      • Disability Discrimination
      • Pregnancy Discrimination
      • Race Discrimination
      • Family Medical Leave Act
      • Overtime Pay and Minimum Wage
      • Employment Contracts & Severance Packages
      • Restrictive Covenants & Non-Compete Agreements
      • Executive Compensation
      • View All
    • First Amendment Lawyers
      ▼
      • Ohio Free Speech Attorneys
        ▼
        • Government Employee Free Speech
        • Student Free Speech Rights in Ohio
        • Significant Ohio Free Speech Cases
      • Religious Freedom
    • Appellate Practice
    • Small Business Litigation
  • About Us
    ▼
    • Cathleen M. Bolek
    • Matthew D. Besser
    • Amy S. Glesius
    • Kelly S. Rochotte
  • Results
  • FAQ
  • Articles
  • BBG Newsroom
  • Contact
  • Blog