• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Bolek Besser Glesius LLC

Bolek Besser Glesius LLC

Devoted to Justice

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment Law
      • Wrongful Termination
      • Workplace Retaliation & Whistleblower Cases
      • Sexual Harassment
      • Age Discrimination Attorney
      • Disability Discrimination
      • Pregnancy Discrimination
      • Race Discrimination
      • Family Medical Leave Act
      • Overtime Pay and Minimum Wage
      • Employment Contracts & Severance Packages
      • Restrictive Covenants & Non-Compete Agreements
      • Executive Compensation
      • View All
    • First Amendment Lawyers
      • Ohio Free Speech Attorneys
        • Government Employee Free Speech
        • Student Free Speech Rights in Ohio
        • Significant Ohio Free Speech Cases
      • Religious Freedom
    • Appellate Practice
    • Small Business Litigation
  • About Us
    • Cathleen M. Bolek
    • Matthew D. Besser
    • Amy S. Glesius
    • Kelly S. Rochotte
  • Results
  • FAQ
  • Articles
  • BBG Newsroom
  • Contact
  • Blog
(216) 464-3004
Contact Us Now
GET HELP NOW
CALL US NOW

Employees of Subcontractors can sue for Racial Harassment

January 15, 2014 By Matthew Besser Leave a Comment

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently issued an important decision regarding the rights of subcontractor employees to sue the general contractor or business owner for workplace racial harassment. The case, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Skanska USA Building, Inc., (Case No. 12-5967; 6th Cir. December 10, 2013), could have an important impact for Cleveland area employees who perform work that benefits multiple employers at the same time. More on that below.

Title VII, and its Ohio counterpart Revised Code Chapter 4112, prohibit employers from discriminating against or harassing employees on the basis of race. The question of who is the “employer,” however is not always that obvious. When employees of staffing agencies, independent contractors, or subcontractors face workplace discrimination, which of the companies involved may be held liable as an “employer” is often hotly debated. In these situations, the company to whom the employee is loaned out (e.g. the general contractor) might be considered the “employer” for purposes of an employment discrimination lawsuit under a “joint employer” theory. Joint employment exists where two separate employers share or co-determine matters regarding the basic terms and conditions of employment, such as hiring, firing, discipline, and pay. Whether such a relationship existed was the issue the Court had to resolve in Skanska.

In the Skanska case, a general contractor hired a subcontractor to provide employees at a hospital construction site. Several of the subcontractor’s African-American employees were subjected to terrible racial slurs (and even a despicable assault with liquid from a porta-potty) at the construction site by employees of the general contractor. Because the general contractor supervised and controlled the day-to-day activities of all employees at the worksite without any oversight or input from the subcontractor, the Court held that the general contractor was an “employer” for purposes of the Title VII race discrimination lawsuit.

A joint employment relationship is not uncommon for Cleveland employees. Typical examples include staffing agencies, subcontractors, and delivery drivers. Where the direct employer loans out the employee, but the “main” employer dictates matters like discipline, hiring and firing, hours, and pay, a joint employment relationship likely exists. When employment discrimination or harassment occurs in a joint employment situation, both employers are responsible under Title VII and Ohio law.

Filed Under: Race discrimination Tagged With: race discrimination, subcontractors

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Best Law Firms - Regional Tier 1 BadgeBest Lawyers Amy Glesius Lawyer of the Year BadgeMartindale AV Rated BadgeSuper Lawyers Top 100 Badge BBB Accredited Business BadgeMillion Dollar Advocates Badge

Contact Us Now

  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

U.S. News Best Law Firms 2019 BadgeBest Lawyers Amy Glesius Lawyer of the Year BadgeSuper Lawyers Top 100 BadgeMartindale AV Rated BadgeBest Law Firms - Regional Tier 1 Badge

Contact Us Now

  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Footer

Social

Follow along on social media.

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Our Cleveland Office

Monarch Centre

5885 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 302

Cleveland, OH 44124

Contact Now

Phone: 216-464-3004

Disclaimer | Privacy Policy

Contact Our Firm

Monarch Centre

5885 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 302

Cleveland, OH 44124

Contact Now

Phone: 216-464-3004

Disclaimer

Copyright © 2025 · Business Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Employment Law
      ▼
      • Wrongful Termination
      • Workplace Retaliation & Whistleblower Cases
      • Sexual Harassment
      • Age Discrimination Attorney
      • Disability Discrimination
      • Pregnancy Discrimination
      • Race Discrimination
      • Family Medical Leave Act
      • Overtime Pay and Minimum Wage
      • Employment Contracts & Severance Packages
      • Restrictive Covenants & Non-Compete Agreements
      • Executive Compensation
      • View All
    • First Amendment Lawyers
      ▼
      • Ohio Free Speech Attorneys
        ▼
        • Government Employee Free Speech
        • Student Free Speech Rights in Ohio
        • Significant Ohio Free Speech Cases
      • Religious Freedom
    • Appellate Practice
    • Small Business Litigation
  • About Us
    ▼
    • Cathleen M. Bolek
    • Matthew D. Besser
    • Amy S. Glesius
    • Kelly S. Rochotte
  • Results
  • FAQ
  • Articles
  • BBG Newsroom
  • Contact
  • Blog