• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Bolek Besser Glesius LLC

Bolek Besser Glesius LLC

Devoted to Justice

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment Law
      • Wrongful Termination
      • Workplace Retaliation & Whistleblower Cases
      • Sexual Harassment
      • Age Discrimination Attorney
      • Disability Discrimination
      • Pregnancy Discrimination
      • Race Discrimination
      • Family Medical Leave Act
      • Overtime Pay and Minimum Wage
      • Employment Contracts & Severance Packages
      • Restrictive Covenants & Non-Compete Agreements
      • Executive Compensation
      • View All
    • First Amendment Lawyers
      • Ohio Free Speech Attorneys
        • Government Employee Free Speech
        • Student Free Speech Rights in Ohio
        • Significant Ohio Free Speech Cases
      • Religious Freedom
    • Appellate Practice
    • Small Business Litigation
  • About Us
    • Cathleen M. Bolek
    • Matthew D. Besser
    • Amy S. Glesius
    • Kelly S. Rochotte
  • Results
  • FAQ
  • Articles
  • BBG Newsroom
  • Contact
  • Blog
(216) 464-3004
Contact Us Now
GET HELP NOW
CALL US NOW

Bill to Ban LGBT Discrimination in Employment to Get Senate Vote

October 31, 2013 By Matthew Besser Leave a Comment

People are often surprised when we tell them that neither Ohio nor federal law prohibits employment discrimination against people on the basis of sexual orientation. That might soon change, at least on the federal level.

US Capitol BuildingThis week, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid announced that the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, or “ENDA,” would soon get a vote in the Senate. Most people know that federal law prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, national origin, religion, age and disability. ENDA would add sexual orientation to that list. It would also outlaw employment discrimination on the basis of gender identity—an individual’s self-conception of their gender, regardless of biological sex at birth.

As the law stands now, the protections for LGBT employees in the workplace are almost non-existent, as we have written about here. Sexual orientation discrimination is legal in twenty-nine states, including Ohio. Discrimination on the basis of gender identity is legal in thirty-three states, also including Ohio. Public sector employees may have some constitutional or statutory protection, but private sector employees have virtually none. One potential claim a private sector LGBT employee might have is for “sex stereotyping,” which occurs when an employee is discriminated against because his or her appearance or mannerisms do not conform to “traditional” gender norms. But those claims are difficult to prove and will not be useful for many LGBT employees facing workplace discrimination. And while the vast majority of Fortune 500 companies have policies prohibiting at least sexual orientation discrimination, they are basically unenforceable by employees.

ENDA would finally provide protection for employees in Ohio, and in every State, who face arbitrary discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. It has been introduced in every Congress since 1994, and has been getting closer and closer to passing. With fifty-four sponsors in the Senate this time, and at least some bipartisan support, ENDA appears fairly likely to pass the Senate. Whether the Speaker of the House will permit ENDA to even come to a vote in the House—let alone whether it would pass there—seems less clear. However, polling shows that a sizable majority of Americans (recently estimated at nearly 70%) support banning LGBT discrimination in the workplace. As a result, it is probably just a matter of time before the swell of public sentiment and political pressure forces Congress to pass ENDA.

Just as we do not tolerate employment discrimination on the basis of race, age, sex, disability, etc., we should not tolerate it on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. With Ohio and many other States lagging behind in outlawing this irrational discrimination, Congress may finally be stepping up to the plate. Stay tuned.

Filed Under: Employment discrimination

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Best Law Firms - Regional Tier 1 BadgeBest Lawyers Amy Glesius Lawyer of the Year BadgeMartindale AV Rated BadgeSuper Lawyers Top 100 Badge BBB Accredited Business BadgeMillion Dollar Advocates Badge

Contact Us Now

  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

U.S. News Best Law Firms 2019 BadgeBest Lawyers Amy Glesius Lawyer of the Year BadgeSuper Lawyers Top 100 BadgeMartindale AV Rated BadgeBest Law Firms - Regional Tier 1 Badge

Contact Us Now

  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Footer

Social

Follow along on social media.

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Our Cleveland Office

Monarch Centre

5885 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 302

Cleveland, OH 44124

Contact Now

Phone: 216-464-3004

Disclaimer | Privacy Policy

Contact Our Firm

Monarch Centre

5885 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 302

Cleveland, OH 44124

Contact Now

Phone: 216-464-3004

Disclaimer

Copyright © 2025 · Business Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Employment Law
      ▼
      • Wrongful Termination
      • Workplace Retaliation & Whistleblower Cases
      • Sexual Harassment
      • Age Discrimination Attorney
      • Disability Discrimination
      • Pregnancy Discrimination
      • Race Discrimination
      • Family Medical Leave Act
      • Overtime Pay and Minimum Wage
      • Employment Contracts & Severance Packages
      • Restrictive Covenants & Non-Compete Agreements
      • Executive Compensation
      • View All
    • First Amendment Lawyers
      ▼
      • Ohio Free Speech Attorneys
        ▼
        • Government Employee Free Speech
        • Student Free Speech Rights in Ohio
        • Significant Ohio Free Speech Cases
      • Religious Freedom
    • Appellate Practice
    • Small Business Litigation
  • About Us
    ▼
    • Cathleen M. Bolek
    • Matthew D. Besser
    • Amy S. Glesius
    • Kelly S. Rochotte
  • Results
  • FAQ
  • Articles
  • BBG Newsroom
  • Contact
  • Blog